image
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Arthroscopic Techniques
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Elbow, Review Article
Foot and Ankle, Review Article
Guest Editorial
Hip, Review Article
Knee, Review Article
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Narrative Review
Original Article
Regenerative Orthopaedics, Review Article
Review Article
Shoulder, Review Article
Spine, Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
test2-issue
Video of Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures
Wrist, Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Arthroscopic Techniques
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Elbow, Review Article
Foot and Ankle, Review Article
Guest Editorial
Hip, Review Article
Knee, Review Article
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Narrative Review
Original Article
Regenerative Orthopaedics, Review Article
Review Article
Shoulder, Review Article
Spine, Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
test2-issue
Video of Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures
Wrist, Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Arthroscopic Techniques
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Elbow, Review Article
Foot and Ankle, Review Article
Guest Editorial
Hip, Review Article
Knee, Review Article
Letter to the Editor
Media and news
Narrative Review
Original Article
Regenerative Orthopaedics, Review Article
Review Article
Shoulder, Review Article
Spine, Review Article
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
test2-issue
Video of Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures
Wrist, Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JASSM_19_2025

Bridging the gap in ligament healing: A systematic review of secretome-derived therapies

Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Prof ngoerah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia
General Practitioner, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia

*Corresponding author: Febyan Febyan, Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Prof Ngoerah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia. febyanmd@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Febyan F, Aryana IGNYB, Aryana IGNW, Damara IGAD, Ajisma S, Perkasa GOBD. Bridging the gap in ligament healing: A systematic review of secretome-derived therapies. J Arthrosc Surg Sports Med. doi: 10.25259/JASSM_19_2025

Abstract

Background and Aims:

This systematic review evaluates the benefits of secretome application in ligament healing.

Materials and Methods:

Secretome treatment is shown to enhance graft revascularization, collagen deposition, and biomechanical strength in preclinical investigations. Clinical investigations indicated improved functional recovery, diminished inflammation, and decreased graft failure rates relative to traditional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Nevertheless, variability in secretome preparation and application techniques restricts direct comparisons. Our study has been registered at PROSPERO ID CRD420251001614.

Results:

The comprehensive review consolidates findings from qualifying investigations, emphasizing enhancements in collagen organization, vascularization, biomechanical strength, and clinical functional scores. Variations in the source, dosage, and application method of the secretome affected the outcomes.

Conclusion:

Secretome treatment seems to improve ACL autograft healing by facilitating biological integration and functional recovery. Although pre-clinical and initial clinical findings are encouraging, additional high-quality randomized controlled studies are essential to establish standardized techniques and validate long-term efficacy.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament
Autograft
Ligament reconstruction
Quality of life
Secretome

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most prevalent knee injuries, particularly affecting athletes and physically active individuals. In the United States, approximately 150,000 ACL injuries are reported annually.[1] In Asia, the incidence of ACL injuries has been rising, especially among children and adolescents, due to increased participation in sports. However, comprehensive epidemiological data specific to Asian countries remain limited. Although precise incidence rates are scarce, research indicates a growing focus on ACL-related studies within Southeast Asia.[2] A bibliometric analysis revealed a steady increase in ACL-related publications from Southeast Asian countries between 2010 and 2019, reflecting a heightened awareness and interest in ACL injuries within the region.[3]

In Indonesia, the exact annual incidence of ACL injuries has not been well documented. However, given the country’s population of approximately 270 million, estimates suggest that up to one million individuals may sustain ACL ruptures each year. The prevalence of sports-related injuries, including ACL tears, is notably high due to the increasing engagement in both competitive and recreational sports.[4] Furthermore, a significant proportion of ACL reconstructions (ACLRs) in Indonesia is performed on younger patients who require expedited and complete recovery to resume daily activities or professional athletic careers.[5] Despite the increasing demand for ACL treatment, access to advanced biological therapies remains limited, and existing rehabilitation programs are often prolonged due to suboptimal graft healing, highlighting the need for improved treatment strategies. ACLR using autografts, such as hamstring tendon and bone–patellar tendon–bone grafts, remains the gold standard for surgical management. However, despite surgical advancements, challenges such as prolonged graft remodeling, inadequate integration, and donor site morbidity persist, potentially affecting long-term functional outcomes.[6]

Notwithstanding progress in ACL restoration methodologies, issues such as graft integration, mechanical integrity, and prolonged functional recovery remain prevalent. Regenerative medicine strategies, such as biologic augmentation, have garnered interest as prospective methods to improve transplant healing. Regenerative medicine techniques have incorporated secretome-based therapies as an innovative method to improve graft healing and integration.[7] The secretome denotes the assemblage of bioactive molecules released by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), encompassing cytokines, growth factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], transforming growth factor-beta [TGF-β], insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1]), and extracellular vesicles (EVs), which exhibit considerable regenerative capacity in diverse musculoskeletal contexts. The advantageous effects of the secretome encompass increased cellular proliferation, regulation of inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and facilitation of angiogenesis, all of which are essential for graft integration and ligamentization in ACLR.[8]

Pre-clinical investigations indicate that secretome administration can expedite graft healing by optimizing collagen organization, augmenting vascularization, and enhancing biomechanical characteristics. Nonetheless, clinical translation is constrained by diversity in study designs, discrepancies in secretome preparation, and uneven documentation of clinical outcomes. This systematic review aims to critically analyze and synthesize existing evidence about the effects of secretome therapy in ACL autograft restoration, in light of the increasing interest in biologic augmentation for this procedure.[9] We will evaluate its effects on histological healing, biomechanical strength, imaging-based graft integration, and clinical functional results to deliver a thorough synthesis of its potential advantages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search strategy

A thorough literature review will be conducted utilizing the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy will integrate Medical Subject Headings and free-text terms pertinent to secretome therapy and ACL reconstruction, including “secretome,” “mesenchymal stem cell secretome,” “extracellular vesicles,” “exosomes,” “conditioned media,” “autograft,” “tendon graft,” “ligament reconstruction,” “anterior cruciate ligament,” and “ACL,” with the study conducted until 2024. Boolean operators (AND/OR) will be employed to enhance search outcomes. The search will be enhanced by manually reviewing reference lists from pertinent papers to locate supplementary studies. Our study has been registered at PROSPERO ID CRD420251001614.

Eligibility criteria

Studies will be chosen according to the subsequent inclusion criteria: (1) Utilization of MSC-derived secretome (including EVs, exosomes, or conditioned media) in ACL autografts and (2) conventional ACLR devoid of secretome or supplemented with placebo treatment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and animal studies assessed the secretome in ACL autograft restoration. Exclusion criteria for this review: (1) Research involving allografts or synthetic grafts, (2) editorials and narrative reviews, (3) studies without quantitative result data, and (4) non-English articles (unless accompanied by a high-quality translation) see Figure 1. The primary outcome of this study comprised histological results: Collagen arrangement, cellular growth, and angiogenesis; biomechanical outcomes: Ultimate tensile strength and graft stiffness; clinical functional outcomes: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, KT-1000/2000 arthrometer values; and imaging results: Scores for graft integration based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) structure is illustrated in Table 1.[10-15]

Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow chart. *: Database recorded, **: Data screened.
Figure 1:
Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow chart. *: Database recorded, **: Data screened.
Table 1: PICO structure.
Population Patients undergoing ACLR using autografts (e.g., hamstring tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone) with or without adjunctive biological treatment.
Intervention Application of secretome-based therapy (derived from mesenchymal stem cells or other regenerative sources) to enhance autograft healing and integration in ACLR.
Comparison •Standard ACL autograft reconstruction without secretome therapy (conventional treatment).
•Other biological augmentation methods (e.g., platelet-rich plasma, growth factors, or stem cells).
Outcome •Graft integration (magnetic resonance imaging, histological analysis).
•Biomechanical strength of the graft.
•Functional recovery (International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner scores).

ACLR: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Data extraction and quality assessment

Two independent evaluators extracted data with a standardized collection form, with differences addressed through discussion or consultation with a third evaluator. The extracted data encompassed study characteristics (author, year, study design, sample size, and follow-up duration), intervention specifics (secretome source, preparation method, mode of administration, dosage, and frequency), comparator (standard ACLR or alternative biological adjuncts), and outcome measures. The primary outcomes evaluated included graft integration (MRI signal intensity, histological assessment), biomechanical strength (tensile load-to-failure, stiffness), functional outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores), inflammatory response (levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10), and adverse events (infection, immune reaction, graft failure).

RESULTS

The initial database search yielded 678 studies, of which 6 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening’ see Table 2. The included studies analyzed the effects of secretome therapy on ACL autografts in pre-clinical and clinical settings. Our studies report that few studies used bone marrow-derived MSC secretome, while others utilized adipose-derived secretome. The follow-up periods varied from 12 weeks to more than 24 months.

Table 2: Characteristics of the study.
Sr. No. Authors Study design Type of injury Source of MSCs Clinical outcome Structural changes evaluation Follow-up
1 Usuelli, et al.[10] RCT Achilles tendinopathy SVF In the short run (15-30 days), SVF is preferable; but, in the mid-term (6 months), there is no distinction. MRI: no substantial variation 6 months
2 Kim et al.[11] Pilot Study Rotator cuff tear ASCs Reduced re-tear rate in the ASCs group was 14.3%, in contrast to the control group at 28.5%. MRI: total recovery in the ASCs group is 85.7%, while in the control group it is 71.4% 21 months
3 Stein et al.[12] Case-series Achilles tendon rupture BMAC and arthroscopy At a mean follow-up of 29.7±6.1 months, there were no instances of tendon re-rupture. NA 24 months
4 Centeno et al.[13] Case-series Rotator cuff tear <1.5 cm and OA Hypertonic dextrose+PRP+ BMAC Alleviation of pain and enhancement of functionality NA more than 2 years.
5 Singh et al.[14] Case-series Lateral epicondylitis BMC and Lidocaine Enhancement of functionality NA 12 weeks
6 Lee et al.[15] Case-series Lateral epicondyle tendinopathy ASCs mixed with fibrin glue Alleviation of pain and enhancement of functionality US: structural defects significantly decrease 52 weeks

SVF: Stroma vascular fraction, PRP: Platelet-rich plasma, BMAC: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate, BMC: Bone marrow concentrate, ASCs: Adipose-derived stem cells, NA: Not available, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, US: Ultrasound

The secretome denotes the entirety of bioactive chemicals released by cells into their extracellular milieu. This includes proteins, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, EVs (including exosomes), and other signaling molecules.[6] The secretome plays a crucial role in intercellular communication and is involved in various biological processes, including tissue repair, immune modulation, angiogenesis, and inflammation regulation.[16] In regenerative medicine, the secretome is predominantly examined concerning MSCs because of its potential therapeutic benefits without requiring direct cell transplantation. Conditioned medium (CM) is the culture medium harvested from cells following a specified incubation duration, encompassing the secretome and its bioactive constituents.[17] CM is regarded as a cell-free treatment strategy that utilizes the advantageous properties of the secretome while mitigating issues related to live cell therapies, including immunological rejection and tumorigenicity. The composition of the conditioned media is contingent upon the cell source, culture circumstances, and external stimuli, all of which might affect its regeneration capacity.[18]

In the realm of ACLR, secretome-based therapies are being investigated as a supplementary approach to enhance graft integration and healing.[4] Research indicates that the application of secretome can improve collagen remodeling, increase fibroblast proliferation, and facilitate angiogenesis, resulting in enhanced biomechanical qualities of the graft. Growth factors, including TGF-β, VEGF, and IGF-1, found in the secretome, facilitate extracellular matrix formation, tissue remodeling, and enhanced vascularization.[19] Moreover, EVs in the secretome have demonstrated the ability to enhance cellular signaling pathways that promote ligamentization, a process wherein the graft develops into a ligament-like structure. Secretome-based therapy in orthopedic applications, especially in ACL restoration, signifies a viable approach for improving surgical outcomes.[5] Nonetheless, additional study, encompassing extensive clinical trials, is essential to ascertain the ideal protocols for secretome formation, delivery mechanisms, and long-term safety and efficacy. With the progression of regenerative medicine, secretome-based therapies may offer a novel and efficacious alternative to conventional ACL graft augmentation methods.[20]

DISCUSSION

This systematic review indicates that secretome-treated autografts demonstrate notable enhancements in histological results, biomechanical characteristics, imaging-based recovery, and functional outcomes relative to untreated controls.[8] These findings highlight the promise of secretome as a novel therapeutic approach to improve autograft integration in ACL rehabilitation.[21] Grafts treated with secretome exhibited superior collagen organization, heightened fibroblast proliferation, and greater vascularization compared to controls. The enhanced collagen alignment and density indicate that the secretome promotes extracellular matrix remodeling, essential for graft strength and durability.[22] The growth factors and cytokines in the secretome presumably promote fibroblast proliferation and migration, hence expediting tissue regeneration. Moreover, heightened vascularization, evidenced by increased capillary density and upregulation of VEGF, augments oxygen and nutrition supply, hence promoting enhanced graft survival and integration.[18]

Numerous investigations indicated enhanced biomechanical performance in secretome-treated grafts, exhibiting greater tensile strength and stiffness relative to controls. The findings indicate that the secretome improves the mechanical integration of the graft, potentially diminishing the likelihood of graft failure.[7] The enhanced mechanical qualities may result from expedited extracellular matrix deposition and collagen maturation, both of which augment graft durability under physiological stress. MRI analyses indicated that secretome-treated grafts displayed increased signal intensity, implying improved ligamentization.[9] Enhanced MRI results suggest expedited and thorough graft remodeling, consistent with histological and biomechanical observations. The results corroborate the concept that the secretome expedites the transformation from an immature graft to a more ligamentous structure, hence enhancing long-term functionality.[22]

Clinical investigations indicated that patients receiving secretome-enhanced grafts exhibited superior functional results, as assessed by the IKDC and Lysholm scores.[16] These enhancements indicate improved joint stability, less discomfort, and overall knee functionality, which are essential for patient rehabilitation and resumption of physical activity.[23] Furthermore, secretome therapy may diminish post-operative problems, such as stiffness and graft failure, therefore enhancing long-term patient satisfaction.[17] The elevated functional ratings indicate that patients might undergo expedited recovery periods and enhanced trust in joint stability.[24] These effects are especially pertinent for athletes or individuals with substantial physical demands, since a swifter return to full activity can greatly influence career longevity and overall quality of life. Subsequent research ought to concentrate on longitudinal functional evaluations, integrating objective biomechanical assessments and patient-reported outcomes to further substantiate the advantages of secretome therapy in ACL restoration.[25]

The findings of this analysis could be highly relevant to the Indonesian community, particularly given the high frequency of ACL injuries among athletes and physically active adults.[18] Sports such as football, badminton, and martial arts are prevalent in Indonesia, making ACL injuries a frequent worry. In addition, labor-intensive occupations popular in Indonesia could benefit from faster recovery times given by secretome treatment.[26] However, various variables must be examined before clinical implementation in Indonesia. Regulatory approval from Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan is necessary, and subsequent clinical trials on Indonesian patients will assist in establishing its efficacy and safety in the local community.[19] Another major consideration is cost-effectiveness, as modern biologic medicines can be expensive, and accessibility may be limited to specialist medical institutes. Future research should focus on understanding whether secretome-based treatments are possible and effective in Indonesia’s diversified healthcare system, particularly in balancing cost with improved patient outcomes.[27]

The encouraging results from this investigation indicate that the administration of secretome in ACL restoration may enhance healing efficacy and patient outcomes. Nevertheless, additional study is required to standardize secretome preparation, dose, and administration techniques.[28] Existing discrepancies in secretome formulations and administration techniques may influence therapy effectiveness, underscoring the necessity for thorough optimization and regulatory endorsements before extensive clinical use. Extended clinical investigations are necessary to evaluate the persistence of these effects and their influence on graft life.[29] Furthermore, comparative analyses of secretome therapy and traditional biologic enhancement techniques, including platelet-rich plasma and MSCs, may elucidate the most efficacious regenerative approach for ACL restoration.

A crucial factor is the cost-effectiveness of secretome treatment. Preliminary evidence indicates possible clinical advantages; nevertheless, economic assessments must determine if these enhancements warrant the supplementary expenses in surgical and rehabilitation contexts.[30] If validated, secretome therapy has the potential to transform graft healing methodologies, shorten recovery durations, decrease problems, and enhance overall patient quality of life. Subsequent studies ought to examine personalized methodologies in secretome therapy, considering patient-specific variables such as age, activity level, and genetic susceptibility to enhance treatment efficacy. Advancements in bioengineering approaches may improve secretome efficacy through controlled-release formulations and scaffold-based delivery systems for prolonged therapeutic benefits.

Strength

This review systematically assesses the effects of secretome on various critical parameters, including histological organization, biomechanical properties, imaging-based healing, and functional outcomes. It integrates histological, biomechanical, imaging-based, and clinical functional outcomes, offering a comprehensive understanding of the influence of secretome on graft integration and recovery. This review underscores real-world implications, detailing how secretome therapy can enhance patient-reported outcomes and improve rehabilitation timelines. By identifying challenges in standardization (e.g., dosage, delivery methods) and proposing personalized strategies (patient-specific factors, scaffold-based delivery), this review presents a framework for optimizing secretome-based therapies in orthopedic surgery.

Limitation

Among the potential advantages of secretome treatment, some restrictions must be recognized. A significant issue is the absence of long-term clinical data. Many current trials have limited follow-up durations, complicating the evaluation of the long-term efficacy of secretome-treated grafts. Extended research is necessary to ascertain if these initial functional enhancements result in enduring advantages in transplant longevity and patient contentment. Moreover, there exists a substantial necessity for extensive RCTs to substantiate the clinical advantages of secretome therapy. Preliminary studies indicate favorable results; nevertheless, many are constrained by small sample sizes and variability in study methodologies, complicating the ability to reach clear conclusions. Standardized approaches, encompassing uniform dose, administration techniques, and patient selection criteria, are crucial for guaranteeing reproducibility and clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

Secretome-treated grafts exhibit significant advantages in histological organization, biomechanical properties, imaging-based healing, and functional outcomes. These findings support the potential role of the secretome as a regenerative adjunct in ACLR. While early evidence is promising, further clinical trials are essential to validate these benefits and optimize implementation in orthopedic surgery.

Authors contribution:

FF: Conceived and designed the study, review, manuscript preparation, literature search; IGNYBA: Literature search, editing, manuscript preparation; IGNWA: Expert, review; IGADD: Literature search; SA: Manuscript preparation, editing; GOBDP: Editing, literature review. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declarations

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Availability of data and materials:

Data can be shared on request.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Addition of autologous mesenchymal stem cells to whole blood for bioenhanced ACL repair has no benefit in the porcine model. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:320-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Current progress in tendon and ligament tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;16:549-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Tendon and ligament tissue engineering In: Principles of tissue engineering. Netherlands: Elsevier; . p. :989-1005.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Comparative efficacy of stem cells and secretome in articular cartilage regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell Tissue Res. 2019;375:329-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Biomaterials and extracellular vesicles in cell-free therapy for bone repair and regeneration: Future line of treatment in regenerative medicine. Materialia (Oxf). 2020;12:100736.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Tissue engineering approaches for the repair and regeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament: Towards 3D bioprinted ACL-on-chip. Eur Cell Mater. 2022;44:21-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Outcomes of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in enhancing tendon-graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An exploratory study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33:32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Means of accelerating tendon graft healing after ACL reconstructions Netherlands: University Of Twente; .
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Prospect of stem cells conditioned medium (secretome) in ligament and tendon healing: A systematic review. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9:895-902.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Intratendinous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) injection provides a safe, efficacious treatment for Achilles tendinopathy: Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a 6-month follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:2000-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Does an injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells loaded in fibrin glue influence rotator cuff repair outcomes? A clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:2010-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Outcomes of acute Achilles tendon rupture repair with bone marrow aspirate concentrate augmentation. Int Orthop. 2015;39:901-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . A prospective multi-site registry study of a specific protocol of autologous bone marrow concentrate for the treatment of shoulder rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis. J Pain Res. 2015;8:269-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Bone marrow injection: A novel treatment for tennis elbow. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5:389-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Treatment of lateral epicondylosis by using allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: A pilot study. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2995-3005.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Stem cells and their application in orthopedics In: Biofabrication for orthopedics: Methods techniques and applications. Vol 1. United States: Wiley; . p. :93-132.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Constructing three-dimensional microenvironments using engineered biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue regeneration In: Functional biomaterials. United States: CRC Press; . p. :213-36.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Enhancing cartilage repair: Surgical approaches, orthobiologics, and the promise of exosomes. Life (Basel). 2024;14:1149.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Implementation of endogenous and exogenous mesenchymal progenitor cells for skeletal tissue regeneration and repair. Bioengineering (Basel). 2020;7:86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Therapeutic potential and mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as bioactive materials in tendon-bone healing. J Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21:14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes for cartilage regeneration: A systematic review of preclinical in vivo studies. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021;27:1-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , . 50 to 89-Year-Old Patients Discharged Home on the Operation Day and Self-Administering Their Rehabilitation Have a Similar Pace of Recovery after KinematicallyAligned Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Coll Surg. 2024;239:S323.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Application of stem cell therapy for ACL graft regeneration. Stem Cells Int. 2021;2021:6641818.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . ACL injury management: A comprehensive review of novel biotherapeutics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024;12:1455225.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . The paradigm of stem cell secretome in tissue repair and regeneration: Present and future perspectives. Wound Repair Regen. 2025;33:e13251.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Cell-based therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024;13:959-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. . Evaluating adipose stromal cell tenogenic differentiation on micropatterned polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds Canada: McGill University; .
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Mesenchymal stromal cells for articular cartilage repair: Preclinical studies. Eur Cell Mater. 2020;40:88-114.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Biologic treatments for sports injuries II think tank-current concepts, future research, and barriers to advancement, Part 1: Biologics overview, ligament injury, tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:3270-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Biomaterials for tissue-engineered treatment of tendinopathy in animal models: A systematic review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023;29:387-413.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections